I recently read an interesting book on UFOs. The book consists of a set of articles written by nine different authors, and so presents a nice variety of views and information. The book is "UFOs: The Final Answer?", edited by Barclay and Barclay, (C) 1993 Blandford Press. I bought my copy for about $10 at Waldenbooks. Perhaps these excerpts will inspire some of you to read the book. Page 60: Carl Sagan once surmised that, on the face of it, there should have been a man on the moon by the Middle Ages. Such a speculation is not so outre as it might first appear. Many ancient civilizations -- most noticeably ancient Greece and China -- obviously had very good, basic knowledge of the properties of matter, astronomy, mathematics, natural philosophy and so on. Therefore, assuming those societies should have progressed in some exponential form, one would have expected a global, technological society by the thirteenth or fourteenth centuries of our era. History shows that it did not happen -- why not? Why is it that not one ancient civilization has survived to go on to greater things? The answer has to be: we are being controlled and manipulated by an unidentified consciousness, the nature of which is to provoke mankind into adopting irrational and rigid belief systems. This statement is really quite shocking, and destructive of all that we hold dear to our hearts; but even more shocking than this is the fact that this control is still being exercised today in the guise of the UFO phenomenon. Page 63: We can now declare with some certainty that UC [unidentified consciousness] works on humanity in such a way as to cause its progress to be halted, or to be altered in some radical way... The UC is operating on the ESP-prone individuals in our society. It is they who are receiving the absurd messages during close ancounters with anomalous phenomena. It is an ongoing pandemic process which, thankfully, does not always result in the message taking societal root; but on those occasions when it has, it spreads like wildfire and its theme is always culturally calamitous. This UC is demonstrably monolithic in intellect, impregnable, unstoppable, and -- if deduction is not a defunct discipline in dealing with it -- would seem to be the originator of all the world's major religions. Page 99: It is a matter of public record that on 20 June 1908, at approximately 7 a.m. an object that eventually exploded with unprecedented violence in the air above the sparsely populated area in the central Siberian plateau known as the Tunguska, passed across the Himalayas, western China and Mongolia... From start to finish, the observed behaviour of the Tunguska object can be shown to be at odds with what could be expected of an incoming bolide. Therefore, although conventional science would feel less threatened by an inanimate explanation for it, on the lines of meteor, comet, small black hole or even contra-terrene matter, the recorded behaviour of the object makes "intelligently guided device" the most probable explanation. Page 108: [Regarding certain events in 1947] But what is clear is that someone somewhere was economical with the truth, and that implies -- as has been maintained by ufologists for years -- that some form of censorship, cover-up if you prefer, is operating when it comes to UFOs. [Much supporting information is provided.] Page 128: The circumstantial evidence is now such as to put beyond reasonble doubt the main thesis that intelligently guided vehicles of a kind not attributable to the efforts of human technology are abroad in the world. To maintain otherwise is to accuse a host of credible witnesses of being unable to know and describe what they have seen. Such an attitude is demeaning to your fellow man, and can only be subscribed to by those whose intellectual arrogance is only outmatched by their lack of maturity. Page 151: Apparently, once a few rat geniuses have solved any particular puzzle, other rats immediately improve in performance. In order to explain this transfer of information, as well as overcome other problems in the life sciences, Rupert Sheldrake suggested that each individual has a morphogenic field, which exists independently of the brain and acts as a template for that individual's behaviour. This, in turn, is part of a greater species morphogenic field. When a group of rats anywhere learn how to solve a puzzle, their morphogenic fields register the solution, which modify the information in the species morphogenic field. From then on, rats everywhere will have an increased chance of solving that particular puzzle for themselves. The theory has been dismissed as mystical nonsense by many of Sheldrake's contemporaries, as well as by the editor of "Nature" magazine, who once asked if Sheldrake's book was fit for burning. Yet the theory has stood up well under experiments, some quite ingenious, designed to test its validity. Something akin to Sheldrake's morphogenic fields might have to be posited if we are ever to explain how new archetypes are formed, and then transmitted throughout the globe. An extension of this theory could well explain the mechanics of the collective hallucination. Page 162: The major reason that Ruth [an American living in London] was in such emotional dire straits was that she was hallucinating an apparition of her father which seemed to be as real as any living person. This was not a case of post-mortem return, as her father was alive and well back in the USA. The point of this case, at least for ufology and the abduction experience, is the fact that the paternal doppelganger hallucinated by Ruth behaved in all respects as if her father were really there. The phantasmagoric image blocked out light and objects in the way normal bodies do when interposed between them and the viewer... But the incident that has ramifications in the area of shared-abduction scenarios happened while she was in America visiting her father: she created a doppelganger of her husband -- which was *also* seen by her father. Apparently, on two previous occasions, when her husband was away from home, Ruth had created his doppelganger and made love to it. Both experiences, she admitted, were sexually very satisfying. Just like the real thing. Now tell me where reality ends and phantasmagoria takes over?